DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Renault Symbol vs 2003 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Symbol

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 16 points.

63.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRenault
SymbolModelClio
2016Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

12,2 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
167 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
90 HPPower98 HP
220 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
4,4 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
4,1 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size165/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4348 mmLength3773 mm
1733 mmWidth1640 mm
1517 mmHeight1417 mm
1059 kgWeight965 Kg
510 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2475 mm

Additional Features

Renault SymbolDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Renault Symbol and 2003 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Symbol leads the E-Kıyasla score by 16 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…