DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Renault Scenic vs 2013 Toyota Probox Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeToyota
ScenicModelProbox
2013Model year2013
MinivanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
110 HPPower109 HP
240 NmTorque141 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears—
205/60 R16 92 HTyre size175/65 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4366 mmLength4195 mm
1845 mmWidth1695 mm
1640 mmHeight1525 mm
1432 KgWeight1030 Kg
2702 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Renault Scenic and 2013 Toyota Probox approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…