DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Alfa Romeo 156 vs 2003 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeVolvo
156ModelS40
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
209 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1948 cc
140 HPPower165 HP
305 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank60 lt
8 ltUrban consumption12 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4435 mmLength4516 mm
1743 mmWidth1716 mm
1430 mmHeight1422 mm
1305 KgWeight1310 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2562 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Alfa Romeo 156 and 2003 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…