DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Scenic vs 2002 Honda Sm-x Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeHonda
ScenicModelSm-x
2003Model year2002
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5Seats4
5Doors4

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1973 cc
136 HPPower131 HP
191 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption8,93 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,43 lt
8,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4259 mmLength3950 mm
1810 mmWidth1695 mm
1620 mmHeight1750 mm
1470 KgWeight1330 Kg
2685 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Scenic and 2002 Honda Sm-x approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…