DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Scenic vs 2003 GAZ 31 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeGAZ
ScenicModel31
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h15,3 s
180 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2134 cc
140 HPPower110 HP
189 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption—
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4425 mmLength4870 mm
1775 mmWidth1800 mm
1720 mmHeight1422 mm
1465 KgWeight1560 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Scenic and 2003 GAZ 31 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…