DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Scenic vs 2000 SsangYong Musso Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeSsangYong
ScenicModelMusso
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
180 km/hTop speed176 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2295 cc
140 HPPower140 HP
189 NmTorque204 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank80 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption16,4 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4425 mmLength4640 mm
1775 mmWidth1864 mm
1720 mmHeight1735 mm
1465 KgWeight1895 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Scenic and 2000 SsangYong Musso approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…