DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Scenic vs 2000 Honda Sm-x Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeHonda
ScenicModelSm-x
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5Seats4
5Doors4

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1973 cc
140 HPPower131 HP
189 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption8,93 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,43 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/65 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4425 mmLength3950 mm
1775 mmWidth1695 mm
1720 mmHeight1750 mm
1465 KgWeight1330 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Scenic and 2000 Honda Sm-x approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…