DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Renault Scenic vs 2012 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeVolvo
ScenicModelV50
2014Model year2012
MinivanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
140 HPPower145 HP
195 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption10,2 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
205/55 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4366 mmLength4522 mm
1845 mmWidth1845 mm
—Height1457 mm
1507 KgWeight1381 Kg
—Wheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Renault Scenic and 2012 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…