DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Renault Scenic vs 1999 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeMazda
ScenicModel323
1999Model year1999
Minivan, MPVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
185 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
109 HPPower90 HP
168 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
12,0 ltUrban consumption6,4 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4134 mmLength4200 mm
1719 mmWidth1705 mm
1675 mmHeight1410 mm
1260 KgWeight1175 Kg
2580 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Renault Scenic and 1999 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…