DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Renault Scenic vs 2002 Kia Shuma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Shuma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeKia
ScenicModelShuma
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

14,5 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
170 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1793 cc
98 HPPower114 HP
250 NmTorque152 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption12,2 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size195/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4425 mmLength4525 mm
1775 mmWidth1720 mm
1720 mmHeight1415 mm
1485 KgWeight1135 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2560 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Renault Scenic and 2002 Kia Shuma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Shuma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…