DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Renault Scenic vs 2002 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeVolvo
ScenicModelS40
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,8 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
173 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
102 HPPower122 HP
200 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R 15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4169 mmLength4516 mm
1719 mmWidth1716 mm
1675 mmHeight1422 mm
1365 KgWeight1230 Kg
2564 mmWheelbase2562 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Renault Scenic and 2002 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…