DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Renault Scenic vs 2017 Ford C-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

64.5–64.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFord
ScenicModelC-Max
2017Model year2017
MinivanBody typeMpv
5Seats—
5Doors—

Performance

11,4 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
190 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1600 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
130 HPPower125 HP
320 NmTorque159 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank55 lt
5,1 ltUrban consumption8,4 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—TransmissionManual
195/55 R20 95HTyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4406 mmLength4379 mm
1866 mmWidth1858 mm
1653 mmHeight1610 mm
1540 KgWeight1374 kg
—Luggage capacity432 lt
2734 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Ford C-MaxDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Renault Scenic and 2017 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…