DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Renault Scenic vs 2016 Ford C-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

64.5–64.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFord
ScenicModelC-Max
2016Model year2016
MinivanBody typeMpv
5Seats—
5Doors—

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
195 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
130 HPPower125 HP
320 NmTorque159 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
5,2 ltUrban consumption8,4 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—TransmissionManual
205/55 R17Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4366 mmLength4379 mm
1845 mmWidth1858 mm
—Height1610 mm
1505 KgWeight1374 kg
—Luggage capacity432 lt

Additional Features

Ford C-MaxDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Renault Scenic and 2016 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…