DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Renault Scenic vs 2016 Ford Figo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFord
ScenicModelFigo
2016Model year2016
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
110 HPPower112 HP
240 NmTorque136 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank42 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/60 R16Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4366 mmLength3995 mm
1845 mmWidth1695 mm
—Height1525 mm
1460 KgWeight—
—Wheelbase2491 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Renault Scenic and 2016 Ford Figo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…