DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Renault Scenic vs 2012 Ford C-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 15.25 points.

60.25–45
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFord
ScenicModelC-Max
2012Model year2012
MinivanBody typeMPV
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h14,3 s
180 km/hTop speed166 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement0 cc
110 HPPower95 HP
240 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption5,5 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption4,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4344 mmLength4520 mm
1845 mmWidth1828 mm
1678 mmHeight1684 mm
1385 KgWeight1504 Kg
2703 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Renault Scenic and 2012 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 15.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…