DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Renault Scenic vs 2017 Nissan Pulsar Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Pulsar

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeNissan
ScenicModelPulsar
2017Model year2017
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h7,7 s
200 km/hTop speed217 km/h
1600 ccEngine displacement1618 cc
160 HPPower190 HP
380 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
53 ltFuel tank46 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
4,7 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 EDCGears6
195/55 R20 95HTyre size205/50 R17; 215/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4634 mmLength4387 mm
1866 mmWidth1768 mm
1660 mmHeight1520 mm
1644/1660 KgWeight1295-1363 Kg
2804 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Renault Scenic and 2017 Nissan Pulsar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Pulsar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…