DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Renault Scenic vs 2017 Abarth 695 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Abarth 695

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeAbarth
ScenicModel695
2017Model year2017
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5/7Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h7,3 s
200 km/hTop speed217 km/h
1600 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
160 HPPower165 HP
380 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
53 ltFuel tank35 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
4,7 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 EDCGears5
195/55 R20 95HTyre size205/40 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4634 mmLength3657 mm
1866 mmWidth1647 mm
1660 mmHeight1485 mm
1644/1660 KgWeight1110 Kg
2804 mmWheelbase2300 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Renault Scenic and 2017 Abarth 695 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Abarth 695 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…