DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Bentley Arnage vs 2002 Holden Vectra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Bentley Arnage

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 28 points.

90.5–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BentleyMakeHolden
ArnageModelVectra
2009Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

5,5 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
288 km/hTop speed200 km/h
6761 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
507 HPPower141 HP
1000 NmTorque200 Nm
8Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
96 ltFuel tank60 lt
28,8 ltUrban consumption—
14,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
19,5 ltAverage consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
255/45 R19Tyre size195/65 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5400 mmLength4477 mm
1900 mmWidth1707 mm
1515 mmHeight1425 mm
2585 KgWeight1359 Kg
3116 mmWheelbase2637 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Bentley Arnage and 2002 Holden Vectra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Bentley Arnage leads the E-Kıyasla score by 28 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…