DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Renault Samsung SM6 vs 2016 Mazda CX-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Samsung SM6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.5–67.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Renault SamsungMakeMazda
SM6ModelCX-3
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,9 s
0 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
110 HPPower105 HP
250 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank48 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6 EDCGears6
—TransmissionAT
205/65 R16 95VTyre size18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4850 mmLength4275 mm
1870 mmWidth1765 mm
1460 mmHeight1535 mm
1420 KgWeight1295 kg
—Luggage capacity350 lt
2810 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Mazda CX-3Driver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRElectronic Parking BrakeHill Start AssistCruise ControlTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerKeyless StartPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsRain SensorLight SensorFolding MirrorsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Renault Samsung SM6 and 2016 Mazda CX-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Samsung SM6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…