DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Renault Megane vs 2016 Abarth 595 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeAbarth
MeganeModel595
2011Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

7,8 s0–100 km/h6,7 s
230 km/hTop speed225 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
180 HPPower180 HP
300 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank35 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
225/40 R18Tyre size205/40 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength3660 mm
1808 mmWidth1627 mm
1471 mmHeight1485 mm
1320 KgWeight1090 Kg
2641 mmWheelbase2300 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Renault Megane and 2016 Abarth 595 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…