2010 • Renault
Megane
Renault Megane 2.0 TCe (180 Hp) 2010Overall Score70.75/100
2010 Renault Megane vs 2010 Saab 9-3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Saab
9-3
Saab 9-3 2.0 t Biopower (200 Hp) 2010Overall Score71.5/100
WINNER
Saab 9-3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Renault MeganeSpecificationSaab 9-3
RenaultMakeSaab
MeganeModel9-3
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Renault MeganeSpecificationSaab 9-3
7,8 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
230 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1985 cc
180 HPPower200 HP
300 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Renault MeganeSpecificationSaab 9-3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank62 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption14,4 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption10,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Renault MeganeSpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/40 R18Tyre size215/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Renault MeganeSpecificationSaab 9-3
4295 mmLength4635 mm
1808 mmWidth1762 mm
1471 mmHeight1466 mm
1320 KgWeight1440 Kg
2641 mmWheelbase2675 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Renault Megane and 2010 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…