2002 • Renault
Megane
Renault Megane 2.0 IDE 16V (140 Hp) 2002Overall Score62.5/100
2002 Renault Megane vs 2002 Ford Maverick Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Ford
Maverick
Ford Maverick 2.0 i 16V AWD (124 Hp) 2002Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Ford Maverick
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Renault MeganeSpecificationFord Maverick
RenaultMakeFord
MeganeModelMaverick
2002Model year2002
CabrioletBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Renault MeganeSpecificationFord Maverick
9,0 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed166 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1989 cc
140 HPPower124 HP
200 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Renault MeganeSpecificationFord Maverick
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank58 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption—
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,6 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Renault MeganeSpecificationFord Maverick
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/50 R16Tyre size225/70 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Renault MeganeSpecificationFord Maverick
4082 mmLength4394 mm
1698 mmWidth1781 mm
1368 mmHeight1722 mm
1200 KgWeight1545 Kg
2468 mmWheelbase2619 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Renault Megane and 2002 Ford Maverick approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Maverick leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…