2002 • Renault
Megane
Renault Megane 2.0 IDE 16V (140 Hp) 2002Overall Score62.5/100
2002 Renault Megane vs 2002 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Chevrolet
Tracker
Chevrolet Tracker 2.0 i 16V (129 Hp) 2002Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Chevrolet Tracker
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Renault MeganeSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
RenaultMakeChevrolet
MeganeModelTracker
2002Model year2002
CabrioletBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats5
2Doors3
Performance
Renault MeganeSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
9,0 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
140 HPPower129 HP
200 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Renault MeganeSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank56 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption—
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
7,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Renault MeganeSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R16Tyre size195/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Renault MeganeSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
4082 mmLength3780 mm
1698 mmWidth1694 mm
1368 mmHeight1689 mm
1200 KgWeight1180 Kg
2468 mmWheelbase2200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Renault Megane and 2002 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chevrolet Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…