DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Megane vs 2000 Tofas Tempra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tofas Tempra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeTofas
MeganeModelTempra
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeEstate
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
140 HPPower130 HP
200 NmTorque159 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption—
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R16Tyre size185/60 R14 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4082 mmLength4472 mm
1698 mmWidth1695 mm
1368 mmHeight1500 mm
1200 KgWeight1075 Kg
2468 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Megane and 2000 Tofas Tempra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tofas Tempra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…