DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Renault Megane vs 2011 KTM X-Bow Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

KTM X-Bow

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

78.75–79.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeKTM
MeganeModelX-Bow
2011Model year2011
CoupeBody typeRoadster
5Seats2
3Doors—

Performance

6,1 s0–100 km/h3,9 s
245 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
250 HPPower240 HP
340 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank40 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,4 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/40 R18Tyre size205/40 R17; 235/40 R18
YesABS—

Dimensions

4299 mmLength3738 mm
—Width1915 mm
1435 mmHeight1202 mm
1387 KgWeight790 Kg
2636 mmWheelbase2430 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Renault Megane and 2011 KTM X-Bow approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, KTM X-Bow leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…