DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Renault Megane vs 2012 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeVolvo
MeganeModelS40
2014Model year2012
Cabriolet, CoupeBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

11,7 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
140 HPPower145 HP
195 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
8,0 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 CVTGears5
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4485 mmLength4476 mm
1811 mmWidth1770 mm
1434 mmHeight1454 mm
1540 KgWeight1360 Kg
2609 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Renault Megane and 2012 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…