DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Renault Megane vs 1996 Rover 600 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 600

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRover
MeganeModel600
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
183 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1850 cc
98 HPPower115 HP
200 NmTorque158 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
6,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,2 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size185/60 R14 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4440 mmLength4645 mm
1699 mmWidth1715 mm
1420 mmHeight1380 mm
1135 KgWeight1330 Kg
2580 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Renault Megane and 1996 Rover 600 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 600 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…