DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Renault Megane vs 1996 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeMazda
MeganeModel626
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h—
183 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1840 cc
98 HPPower90 HP
200 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank0 lt
6,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4440 mmLength—
1699 mmWidth—
1420 mmHeight—
1135 KgWeight—
2580 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Renault Megane and 1996 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…