2005 • Renault
Megane
Renault Megane 1.9 dCi (130 Hp) 2005Overall Score67.75/100
2005 Renault Megane vs 2005 Toyota Matrix Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Toyota
Matrix
Toyota Matrix 1.8i 16V (132 Hp) 2005Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Toyota Matrix
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Renault MeganeSpecificationToyota Matrix
RenaultMakeToyota
MeganeModelMatrix
2005Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Renault MeganeSpecificationToyota Matrix
9,0 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1794 cc
130 HPPower132 HP
300 NmTorque171 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Renault MeganeSpecificationToyota Matrix
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Renault MeganeSpecificationToyota Matrix
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Renault MeganeSpecificationToyota Matrix
4209 mmLength4350 mm
1777 mmWidth1775 mm
1458 mmHeight1540 mm
1270 KgWeight1215 Kg
2625 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Renault Megane and 2005 Toyota Matrix approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Matrix leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…