DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Renault Megane vs 2009 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeVolvo
MeganeModelV50
2009Model year2009
Cabriolet, CoupeBody typeEstate
2+2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
112 HPPower109 HP
152 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank52 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4355 mmLength4522 mm
1777 mmWidth1845 mm
1404 mmHeight1457 mm
1320 KgWeight1416 Kg
2522 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Renault Megane and 2009 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…