1996 • AC
Cobra
AC Cobra 4.9 i V8 Ligntweignt (340 Hp) 1996Overall Score72.5/100
1996 AC Cobra vs 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Chevrolet
Tahoe
Chevrolet Tahoe 5.3 i V8 4WD (273 Hp) 2000Overall Score73.5/100
WINNER
Chevrolet Tahoe
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
72.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
AC CobraSpecificationChevrolet Tahoe
ACMakeChevrolet
CobraModelTahoe
1996Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
AC CobraSpecificationChevrolet Tahoe
5,0 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
225 km/hTop speed170 km/h
4942 ccEngine displacement5328 cc
340 HPPower273 HP
0 NmTorque427 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
AC CobraSpecificationChevrolet Tahoe
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank98 lt
—Urban consumption19,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption12,9 lt
—Average consumption15,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
AC CobraSpecificationChevrolet Tahoe
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
225/60 R16V; 255/60 R16VTyre size265/70 R16 H
—ABSYes
Dimensions
AC CobraSpecificationChevrolet Tahoe
4155 mmLength5052 mm
1745 mmWidth2068 mm
1230 mmHeight1960 mm
1065 KgWeight2419 Kg
2285 mmWheelbase2946 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 AC Cobra and 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chevrolet Tahoe leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
Comments are loading…