DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Renault Megane vs 2017 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 7 points.

56.25–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRenault
MeganeModelClio
2009Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h14,3 s
180 km/hTop speed168 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
90 HPPower75 HP
200 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank45 lt
4,8 ltUrban consumption4,3 lt
4 ltExtra-urban consumption3,2 lt
3,6 ltAverage consumption3,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—TransmissionManual
195/65 R15; 205/55 R16 HTyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength4062 mm
1808 mmWidth1777 mm
1471 mmHeight1448 mm
1215 KgWeight1071 kg
—Luggage capacity300 lt
2641 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Renault ClioDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerKeyless StartPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Renault Megane and 2017 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 7 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…