DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Renault Megane vs 2016 Ford KA Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFord
MeganeModelKA
2016Model year2016
Coupe - CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

12,4 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
110 HPPower110 HP
260 NmTorque146 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol / Ethanol – E85
60 ltFuel tank51 lt
4,9 ltUrban consumption—
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16; 205/50 R17; 225/40 R18Tyre size175/65 R14; 195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4485 mmLength4254 mm
1811 mmWidth1695 mm
1434 mmHeight1460 mm
1576 KgWeight1032 Kg
2609 mmWheelbase2491 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Renault Megane and 2016 Ford KA approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…