DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Megane vs 2003 Ford Fusion Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFord
MeganeModelFusion
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
184 km/hTop speed158 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1399 cc
95 HPPower68 HP
127 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank45 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption5,2 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14; 175/70 R14; 185/55 R15; 185/60 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4164 mmLength4020 mm
1698 mmWidth1708 mm
1420 mmHeight1503 mm
1080 KgWeight1105 Kg
2580 mmWheelbase2488 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Megane and 2003 Ford Fusion approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…