DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Megane vs 1997 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRenault
MeganeModelClio
2000Model year1997
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

13,8 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
170 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
114 NmTorque107 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank43 lt
9,0 ltUrban consumption7 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14; 175/70 R14; 185/55 R15; 185/60 R15Tyre size165/65 R13 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4164 mmLength3709 mm
1698 mmWidth1616 mm
1420 mmHeight1395 mm
1065 KgWeight850 Kg
2580 mmWheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Megane and 1997 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…