DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Renault Megane vs 2016 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFord
MeganeModelMondeo
2016Model year2016
Coupe - CabrioletBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
190 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement998 cc
132 HPPower125 HP
205 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank62 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption6,3 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16; 205/50 R17; 225/40 R18Tyre size215/60 R16; 235/50 R17; 235/45 R18; 235/40 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4485 mmLength4871 mm
1811 mmWidth1852 mm
1434 mmHeight1482 mm
1547 KgWeight1455 Kg
2609 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Renault Megane and 2016 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…