DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1985 Autobianchi A 112 vs 2001 De Tomaso Mangusta Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

De Tomaso Mangusta

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 44.5 points.

40.25–84.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AutobianchiMakeDe Tomaso
A 112ModelMangusta
1985Model year2001
—Body typeCabriolet
—Seats2
—Doors2

Performance

0 km/hTop speed240 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
42 HPPower305 HP
0 NmTorque406 Nm
—Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption20 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size255/40 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4190 mm
—Width1900 mm
—Height1280 mm
—Weight1400 Kg
—Wheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1985 Autobianchi A 112 and 2001 De Tomaso Mangusta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, De Tomaso Mangusta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 44.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

Comments are loading…