DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Renault Megane vs 2014 Ford C-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 18.25 points.

67.25–49
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFord
MeganeModelC-Max
2017Model year2014
SedanBody typeMPV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
190 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement0 cc
110 HPPower115 HP
250 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
4,1 ltUrban consumption5,4 lt
3,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
3,8 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
7Gears6
EDCTransmission—
16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4632 mmLength4380 mm
1814 mmWidth1828 mm
1443 mmHeight1626 mm
1395 kgWeight1390 Kg
550 ltLuggage capacity—

Additional Features

Renault MeganeDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlCollision Avoidance SystemDriver Fatigue DetectionTrip ComputerPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsAlloy WheelsUSB PortBluetooth
Ford C-Max

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Renault Megane and 2014 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 18.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…