DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Renault Logan vs 2009 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Bravo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFiat
LoganModelBravo
2009Model year2009
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,3 s
0 km/hTop speed187 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
102 HPPower105 HP
145 NmTorque290 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank57 lt
—Urban consumption6,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
185/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4250 mmLength4336 mm
1735 mmWidth1792 mm
1525 mmHeight1498 mm
—Weight1320 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Renault Logan and 2009 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…