DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Renault Logan vs 2009 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeCitroen
LoganModelC3
2009Model year2009
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,9 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
102 HPPower120 HP
145 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption7,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,8 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size195/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4250 mmLength3941 mm
1735 mmWidth1728 mm
1525 mmHeight1524 mm
—Weight1075 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2466 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Renault Logan and 2009 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…