DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Renault Latitude vs 2016 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Latitude

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFord
LatitudeModelExplorer
2013Model year2016
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

6,4 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
235 km/hTop speed183 km/h
3498 ccEngine displacement3497 cc
240 HPPower249 HP
330 NmTorque346 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
15,7 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption10,2 lt
10,5 ltAverage consumption12,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6 SelectShift
225/50 R17Tyre size245/60 R18; 255/50 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4897 mmLength5019 mm
1832 mmWidth1988 mm
1483 mmHeight1788 mm
1615 KgWeight—
2762 mmWheelbase2860 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Renault Latitude and 2016 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Latitude leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…