DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Renault Laguna vs 2013 Mazda CX-9 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-9

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeMazda
LagunaModelCX-9
2015Model year2013
CoupeBody typeSUV
4Seats7
2Doors5

Performance

7,4 s0–100 km/h—
244 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3498 ccEngine displacement3726 cc
238 HPPower273 HP
330 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank76 lt
15,0 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption10,7 lt
10,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/50 R17; 225/45 R18Tyre size245/60 R18; 245/50 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4643 mmLength5085-5100 mm
1812 mmWidth1935 mm
1398 mmHeight1727 mm
1522 KgWeight1964 Kg
2694 mmWheelbase2875 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Renault Laguna and 2013 Mazda CX-9 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-9 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…