DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Renault Laguna vs 2016 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Laguna

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFord
LagunaModelExplorer
2013Model year2016
CoupeBody typeSUV
4Seats7
2Doors5

Performance

7,4 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
244 km/hTop speed183 km/h
3498 ccEngine displacement3497 cc
238 HPPower249 HP
330 NmTorque346 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank70 lt
15,0 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption10,2 lt
10,0 ltAverage consumption12,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6 SelectShift
215/50 R17; 225/45 R18Tyre size245/60 R18; 255/50 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4643 mmLength5019 mm
1812 mmWidth1988 mm
1398 mmHeight1788 mm
1522 KgWeight—
2694 mmWheelbase2860 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Renault Laguna and 2016 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Laguna leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…