DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Renault Laguna vs 2004 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Laguna

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

68.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeLand Rover
LagunaModelRange Rover
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,1 s0–100 km/h13,6 s
235 km/hTop speed179 km/h
2946 ccEngine displacement2926 cc
207 HPPower177 HP
285 NmTorque390 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank100 lt
14,9 ltUrban consumption14,4 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
10,1 ltAverage consumption11,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size255/55 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4576 mmLength4950 mm
1772 mmWidth1955 mm
1429 mmHeight1860 mm
1505 KgWeight2500 Kg
2740 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Renault Laguna and 2004 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Laguna leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…