DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Renault Laguna vs 2010 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Laguna

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeVolvo
LagunaModelC30
2010Model year2010
CoupeBody typeCoupe
4Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h8,6 s
220 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
170 HPPower177 HP
270 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
66 ltFuel tank60 lt
13,0 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
8,8 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/50 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4643 mmLength4266 mm
1811 mmWidth1782 mm
1400 mmHeight1447 mm
1555 KgWeight1451 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Renault Laguna and 2010 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Laguna leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…