DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Laguna vs 1996 Renault 19 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Laguna

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 13.25 points.

59.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRenault
LagunaModel19
2000Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
205 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1948 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
139 HPPower80 HP
182 NmTorque109 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank55 lt
12,1 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
—Average consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size165/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4510 mmLength4248 mm
1750 mmWidth1696 mm
1430 mmHeight1412 mm
1285 KgWeight970 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2544 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Laguna and 1996 Renault 19 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Laguna leads the E-Kıyasla score by 13.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…