DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Laguna vs 2003 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Laguna

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeLand Rover
LagunaModelFreelander
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
200 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
120 HPPower117 HP
270 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,2 ltUrban consumption12,9 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4576 mmLength4368 mm
1772 mmWidth1809 mm
1429 mmHeight1708 mm
1425 KgWeight1510 Kg
2740 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Laguna and 2003 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Laguna leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…