DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Renault Kangoo vs 2012 Opel Combo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Combo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

45.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeOpel
KangooModelCombo
2012Model year2012
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

19,6 s0–100 km/h15,4 s
146 km/hTop speed161 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
68 HPPower95 HP
185 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption10,3 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4213 mmLength4390 mm
1829 mmWidth1831 mm
1839 mmHeight1845-2100 mm
1464 KgWeight—
2697 mmWheelbase2755 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Renault Kangoo and 2012 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…