DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Kangoo vs 2003 Citroen Saxo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen Saxo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

42.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeCitroen
KangooModelSaxo
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

16,3 s0–100 km/h18,3 s
146 km/hTop speed158 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1527 cc
65 HPPower57 HP
160 NmTorque95 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size165/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3995 mmLength3718 mm
1663 mmWidth1595 mm
1827 mmHeight1368 mm
1160 KgWeight890 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2385 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Kangoo and 2003 Citroen Saxo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen Saxo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…