DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Renault Kangoo vs 2003 Renault Kangoo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Kangoo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

40.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRenault
KangooModelKangoo
2005Model year2003
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5Seats2
4/5Doors3

Performance

21,2 s0–100 km/h16,9 s
135 km/hTop speed147 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
59 HPPower75 HP
81 NmTorque114 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption10,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,5 lt
—Average consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
165/70 R14 CTyre size165/70 R14 T
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4035 mmLength3995 mm
1672 mmWidth1663 mm
1835 mmHeight1827 mm
—Weight1125 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Renault Kangoo and 2003 Renault Kangoo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Kangoo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…